Mary Poppins Returns

Posted: January 6, 2019 in Film reviews
Tags:

Mary Poppins Returns

Directed by: Rob Marshall. Starring Emily Blunt, Lin-Manuel Miranda, Ben Whishaw, Emily Mortimer Julie Walters, Dick Van Dyke, Angela Lansbury, Colin Firth and Meryl Streep.

null

On reflection I really loved this film.

It’s the 1930s and the Banks children are grown up. Michael (Whishaw) lives in the family home on Cherry Tree lane with his children: Annabel, John and Georgie. His wife passed away a year ago and he’s assisted by his sister Jane (Mortimer) and housekeeper Ellen (Walters). He’s struggling financially though, and this leaves the family home in danger of repossession. Michael believes his father was given shares in Fidelity Fiduciary Bank, but unless he can find them the bank, managed now by William Wilkins (Firth), will turf the family out onto the street.

When Georgie flies the kite Michael and Jane had when they were children he’s almost dragged into the air, but is saved by Jack (Miranda) a lamplighter, the apprentice of Bert from the first film. The kite does seem to have snagged something in the clouds however, and soon enough a familiar silhouette comes gliding down. Mary Poppins (Blunt) is back and is soon ensconced in the Banks’ family home. Michael and Jane remember her but don’t recall any of the fantastical adventures they had, but all too soon Annabel John and Georgie find themselves transported to a world of magic, courtesy of Poppins and Jack, but can the family home be saved?

null

“I’m sorry madame, I have no idea who this Q fellow is but I can assure you it isn’t me.”

I have a confession to make, up until a few weeks ago I’d never seen Mary Poppins, but in anticipation of this sequel I finally watched it. Sadly I wasn’t impressed. Maybe it’s not watching it with the innocence of a child but with the cynicism of an adult, but I found it very flawed. Which didn’t seem to bode well for Mary Poppins Returns.

Except, try as I might I can’t be remotely cynical about Poppins Returns, because I loved every second of it.

Much like The Force Awakens this is ostensibly a sequel, albeit one that hits a multitude of marks from the beloved predecessor. So again we have a father distanced from his children, whose sister, rather than wife, is a social activist. We have a salt of the earth working class bloke who’s fully aware of Mary Poppins and magic, and we have some children in need of a stern, or maybe not so stern, nanny. Oh, and then we have Poppins herself, an authoritative figure who never seems overbearing, a proponent of fun and frolics who carries just a hint of darkness within her (as a side note Emily Blunt might be one of the best Doctor Whos we’ll never have) and we have songs, lots of songs.

Even though I might not have felt like it, millions of people were incredibly trepidations when the sequel was announced. The casting of Blunt suggested Disney knew what they were doing, but still, a lot of people held their breath…but if it can have such an impact on me I can only hope the majority of fans love it.

The film looks gorgeous, and despite homaging the original, none of those homages feel unearned, or like a cheap rip off. It’s an odd thing to say, given how light and fancy free the film feels, but it’s clear that care has been taken over every creative choice, from the script to the casting to the effects and the music. This is a swiss watch of a film, and there’s nary a misstep in any area.

What could have been a leaden, by the numbers, sequel is instead a sumptuously, energic tour de force that doesn’t remotely feel 130 minutes long.

The cast are great, especially the kids. Whishaw and Mortimer are solid, and Firth is moustache twirlingly enjoyable as Wilkins, and there are lovely cameos by Van Dyke, Lansbury and Streep (clearly having a ball) but the beating hearts of this film are Blunt and Miranda.

mv5bmjm4otgzmdi2ov5bml5banbnxkftztgwotk2ndq3njm@._v1_sx1500_cr0,0,1500,999_al_

“Cor blimey, ave a banana!”

Miranda’s theatrical background is put to great use here, and he plays the loveable man of the people to a tee. One thing that surprised me about the original is how often Poppins takes a back seat to Bert, and it’s the same here. I had no real knowledge of Miranda before this, but he makes one hell of an impression.

However good he is, the reason this films works is down to the best casting of all. I won’t lie, I’ve adored Blunt for ages, going back to Young Victoria. I’ve yet to see her flounder; A Quiet Place, The Girl on the Train, Scicario, Edge of Tomorrow…she’s amazing in all of them, so it shouldn’t be a surprise that she scores again. From her clipped accent to the twinkle in her eye that tells us she knows far more than she’s letting on, she’s excellent, what most surprised me was her singing voice, and her energy, especially in the almost vaudevillian ‘A Cover is not the Book’. She sings, she dances, and her comic timing’s second to none.screen-shot-2018-10-23-at-16.42.53

The decision to ape the old school animation of the original, rather than go for something more modern, is a good one. Only time will tell if the songs prove as catchy as those from the original, I suspect not but nobody’s 100% perfect, not even Poppins, and there are a few (very minor) gripes; As with the original there’s sense of the film being a series of set pieces that don’t really advance the plot (though I think it worked better here) and again, despite spending all her time with the children it’s actually a man named Banks she’s really there to help. Walters is good, but she’s essentially just doing Mrs Bird from the Paddington films again, and there’s a clear feeling of similarity with everyone’s favourite Peruvian immigrant, not least because he’s in it. Mortimer feels a little wasted, and hints of a romance don’t go anywhere, and you can’t really feel too sorry for the Banks’ given there’s likely millions far more destitute at the time (but the film’s hardly alone in portraying a rose-tinted vision of the past.)

On the whole though, I loved it. Well directed, scored, written and cast, with cinematography to die for, it might be emotionally manipulative but frankly I was quite happy to have it twist my emotions around its little finger!

Almost practically perfect in every way.

null

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.